More UI Libraries
This lesson covers additional popular UI libraries and frameworks for modern web development.
Other Popular UI Libraries
While Tailwind CSS and Material UI are among the most popular choices, there are many other excellent UI libraries available. Each has its own strengths and use cases.
Component Libraries
Ant Design
Ant Design is an enterprise-level UI design language and React UI library.
Key Features:
- 50+ high-quality React components
- Designed for enterprise applications
- Comprehensive design guidelines
- International support (i18n)
- Strong TypeScript support
- Powerful theming
Installation:
yarn add antd
Usage:
import { Button, DatePicker, Space } from 'antd';
function App() {
return (
<Space>
<Button type="primary">Primary Button</Button>
<DatePicker />
</Space>
);
}
Best For:
- Enterprise applications
- Admin dashboards
- Data-heavy applications
- Complex forms
Chakra UI
Chakra UI is a simple, modular and accessible component library.
Key Features:
- Accessible by default
- Dark mode support
- Highly composable
- Responsive styles
- Theme customization
- TypeScript support
Installation:
yarn add @chakra-ui/react @emotion/react @emotion/styled framer-motion
Usage:
import { ChakraProvider, Button, Box } from '@chakra-ui/react';
function App() {
return (
<ChakraProvider>
<Box p={4}>
<Button colorScheme="blue">Click me</Button>
</Box>
</ChakraProvider>
);
}
Best For:
- Accessibility-focused projects
- Modern web applications
- Projects requiring flexibility
- Teams valuing developer experience
Mantine
Mantine is a fully featured React components library.
Key Features:
- 100+ customizable components
- Dark theme support
- TypeScript based
- Hooks library included
- Form management
- Rich notifications system
Installation:
yarn add @mantine/core @mantine/hooks
Usage:
import { MantineProvider, Button } from '@mantine/core';
function App() {
return (
<MantineProvider>
<Button variant="filled">Click me</Button>
</MantineProvider>
);
}
Best For:
- Feature-rich applications
- Projects needing many components
- TypeScript projects
- Teams wanting comprehensive solutions
CSS Frameworks
Bootstrap
Bootstrap is the most popular CSS framework.
Key Features:
- Mobile-first responsive design
- Extensive component library
- Grid system
- JavaScript plugins
- Customizable via Sass
- Large community
Installation:
yarn add bootstrap
Usage:
import 'bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css';
function App() {
return (
<button className="btn btn-primary">Click me</button>
);
}
Best For:
- Quick prototyping
- Traditional web applications
- Teams familiar with Bootstrap
- Projects needing wide browser support
Bulma
Bulma is a modern CSS framework based on Flexbox.
Key Features:
- Pure CSS (no JavaScript)
- Flexbox-based layout
- Modular architecture
- Responsive by default
- Easily customizable
- Clean syntax
Installation:
yarn add bulma
Usage:
import 'bulma/css/bulma.css';
function App() {
return (
<button className="button is-primary">Click me</button>
);
}
Best For:
- CSS-only solutions
- Flexbox-based layouts
- Projects avoiding JavaScript dependencies
- Simple, clean designs
Headless UI Libraries
Headless UI
Headless UI provides unstyled, accessible UI components.
Key Features:
- Fully accessible
- Unstyled by design
- Works with Tailwind CSS
- React and Vue support
- Composable components
Installation:
yarn add @headlessui/react
Usage:
import { Menu } from '@headlessui/react'
function MyDropdown() {
return (
<Menu>
<Menu.Button>Options</Menu.Button>
<Menu.Items>
<Menu.Item>
{({ active }) => (
<a className={active ? 'bg-blue-500' : ''}
href="/account">
Account
</a>
)}
</Menu.Item>
</Menu.Items>
</Menu>
)
}
Best For:
- Custom design systems
- Tailwind CSS projects
- Projects needing accessibility
- Full styling control
Radix UI
Radix UI provides low-level UI primitives.
Key Features:
- Unstyled components
- Accessibility built-in
- Composable primitives
- Full keyboard navigation
- Focus management
- TypeScript support
Installation:
yarn add @radix-ui/react-dialog
Usage:
import * as Dialog from '@radix-ui/react-dialog';
function MyDialog() {
return (
<Dialog.Root>
<Dialog.Trigger>Open</Dialog.Trigger>
<Dialog.Portal>
<Dialog.Overlay />
<Dialog.Content>
<Dialog.Title>Title</Dialog.Title>
<Dialog.Description>Description</Dialog.Description>
</Dialog.Content>
</Dialog.Portal>
</Dialog.Root>
)
}
Best For:
- Building design systems
- Accessibility-first projects
- Custom component libraries
- Shadcn foundation
Comparison Table
| Library | Type | Bundle Size | Learning Curve | Customization | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tailwind CSS | Utility-first | Small | Medium | High | Custom designs |
| Material UI | Component | Large | Medium | Medium | Material Design |
| Ant Design | Component | Large | Medium | Medium | Enterprise apps |
| Chakra UI | Component | Medium | Low | High | Accessible apps |
| Mantine | Component | Medium | Low | High | Feature-rich apps |
| Shadcn | Copy-paste | Small | Low | Very High | Tailwind projects |
| Bootstrap | CSS Framework | Medium | Low | Medium | Quick prototyping |
| Bulma | CSS Framework | Small | Low | Medium | CSS-only projects |
| Headless UI | Headless | Tiny | Medium | Very High | Custom styling |
| Radix UI | Headless | Tiny | High | Very High | Design systems |
Choosing the Right Library
Consider these factors:
-
Project Type:
- Enterprise app → Ant Design
- Modern web app → Chakra UI, Mantine
- Material Design → Material UI
- Custom design → Tailwind CSS, Shadcn
-
Team Experience:
- Beginners → Bootstrap, Chakra UI
- Experienced → Tailwind CSS, Radix UI
- Enterprise teams → Ant Design, Material UI
-
Customization Needs:
- Full control → Tailwind CSS, Headless UI
- Some customization → Material UI, Chakra UI
- Quick setup → Bootstrap, Ant Design
-
Bundle Size Concerns:
- Small bundle → Tailwind CSS, Shadcn
- Acceptable size → Chakra UI, Mantine
- Large but feature-rich → Material UI, Ant Design
-
Accessibility Priority:
- Critical → Chakra UI, Radix UI, Headless UI
- Important → Material UI, Mantine
- Basic → Bootstrap, Tailwind CSS
Mixing Libraries
You can combine different approaches:
Common Combinations:
- Tailwind CSS + Headless UI
- Tailwind CSS + Radix UI (Shadcn)
- Material UI + Custom CSS
- Bootstrap + Custom components
Be Careful Of:
- Style conflicts
- Increased bundle size
- Maintenance complexity
- Inconsistent design language
Resources
Conclusion
Each UI library has its strengths:
- Need speed? → Bootstrap, Chakra UI
- Need customization? → Tailwind CSS, Shadcn
- Need components? → Material UI, Ant Design
- Need accessibility? → Chakra UI, Radix UI
- Need enterprise features? → Ant Design, Material UI
Choose based on your project requirements, team expertise, and long-term maintenance considerations.